AI-generated personas
synthetic personas
Real Respondents
The Smartest Strategy
As synthetic insights become increasingly available, more researchers are asking:
When should I rely on AI-generated personas—and when do I still need to talk to real people?
It’s a great question, and one we hear a lot from both agencies and brand teams. The truth is, it’s not an either-or decision. Synthetic and real respondents serve different, complementary roles.
Here’s how to think about the difference—and how to use each method for what it does best.
Synthetic personas are AI-generated respondents that simulate how a real person—with a defined demographic, behavioral, or psychographic profile—might answer a survey.
They’re not avatars or chatbots. They don’t represent a single real person. Instead, they model how someone like that persona might think, decide, or react in a given research scenario.
At DataDiggers, this simulation is driven by tools like Syntheo, which applies behavioral logic to each persona. For more complex forecasting or scenario testing, Modeliq extends that logic into dynamic “what-if” simulations—testing how purchase intent or brand perception might shift when a key variable changes (like price, design, or ad message).
Real respondents are, of course, actual people who complete surveys in real time—typically via online panels, email lists, or intercept methods.
While they offer direct feedback, they’re also subject to a host of limitations:
Still, real respondents remain essential for exploring emotionally driven decisions, cultural nuance, and behavior that’s hard to model in advance.
Use synthetic respondents when you want to:
This approach is particularly effective when combined with advanced simulation engines. For example, Modeliq lets you model how behavior might change if a product’s price drops or a competitor launches in the same category.
At scale, tools like Correlix allow you to generate full synthetic datasets based on real-world behavioral patterns. Correlix is purpose-built for bias correction, data augmentation, and simulation at scale, using advanced statistical and machine learning models—ensuring the output reflects population logic while maintaining strict privacy standards.
Real respondents are most valuable when:
In short, they’re best for capturing nuance, variability, and authenticity—the messiness that real life brings.
Synthetic and real respondents shouldn’t compete—they should collaborate. Synthetic personas help you explore possibilities and pressure-test ideas before you invest in real-world testing.
Then, once you’ve narrowed in on the most promising directions, real respondents help you validate what’s truly resonant.
At DataDiggers, we call this the “synthetic-first, human-validated” approach. It keeps your research faster, more iterative, and more grounded—without losing the voice of the people you’re designing for.
Synthetic personas are not a shortcut. They’re a strategic addition to the researcher’s toolkit—especially when used responsibly, transparently, and with clear guardrails.
By combining reasoning-based simulation tools like Syntheo, forecasting logic through Modeliq, and scalable synthetic data generation with Correlix, you can run smarter, faster, and more future-ready research without compromising on integrity.
Want to explore how synthetic and real respondents can work together in your next study?
Let’s talk about building a hybrid approach that fits your timeline, your budget, and your insight goals.
Contact the DataDiggers team to learn more.